Celebrity Dominatrix

Just checking in, as we do from time to time, on Megan Fox without makeup.

(Check out the Megan Fox without makeup thread, here.)

Yah… still beautiful. So why the continuing jihad on Fox and makeup?

(The latest variation came when Entertainment Tonight violated its agreement, a decision apparently endorsed by Womb-Raider-in-Chief Laura Blue Bell. See our report on Entertainment Tonight’s assault on Fox and total lack of integrity afterwards, here.)

1. Some are jealous. Looking at them, one can see why.

2. Some like to pose. “Hey, honey, lookit me, I’m suggesting a famous, prominent beauty isn’t so attractive.”

All of which only goes to show that some people can make prostitutes of themselves with slutty lipstick, or without.

Megan Fox Fan Group. Makeup welcome.


Celebrity Dominatrix — your antidote to “Makeupgate”

Dear Ms. Blue:

We respect Entertainment Tonight, and note with satisfaction that you personally seem to be a journalist of integrity.

You seem to understand something about women, and pregnancy. You proudly took note of a recent interview on motherhood, for example, tweeting “ITS BEYONCE’S FIRST ON CAMERA INTERVIEW POST BABY.” (Your all-caps, not ours.)

But a member of your staff, Steve Jones, lied to Megan Fox to induce an interview…

asked her about pregnancy despite his promise not to…

and then essentially bragged about it in a sarcastic boast designed to raise his own profile and the show’s — regardless of its impact on your integrity and that of ET.

All this, in apparent complete indifference to the sensitivities, both personal and medical, a woman faces early in a pregnancy.

You can read our report on Jones’s callous disregard for your reputation as a journalist and woman, here.

We encourage you to demand a meaningful apology from Mr. Jones, and, even if it comes, reprimand and suspend him. Anything less creates the appearance that you approve of what he did.

If he does not issue such an apology, or refuses to abide by a suspension, you should fire him.

Other entertainment personalities will be watching to see if ET maintains standards of probity and promise-keeping. We trust they, and your viewers, will act accordingly.

Readers: click here to tweet Linda Bell Blue on firing Steve Jones — or use the tweet button here:

Tweet

Celebrity Dominatrix — we don’t lie to our sources

“There they go again” on Megan Fox, who, according to the Maekup Nazis, is, without her kit, indistinguishable from a prune.

Take a close look. Yah, there’s some makeup and probaby photoshop enhancement.

To which, all we have to say is, “Ja und?”

For more background, check out our Megan Fox without makeup thread, here.)

Megan Fox Fan Group. Makeup welcome.


Celebrity Dominatrix — your antidote to “Makeupgate”

We’ve written numerous times about Megan Fox’s alleged less-than-desirable appearance when appearing au natural. (Check out the Megan Fox without makeup thread, here.)

So it’s no surprise to us that Ms. Fox felt the need to defend herself with a series of images at her Facebook site, the gist of which are, “look ma, no Botox.”

It is, however, pathetic. Not for Megan Fox. Rather, as a commentary on her critics.

(By the way, please, no emails, boyos… yes, she’s wearing eye shadow! &tc. The photos were posted in response to allegations she’s using botox. Ms. Fox makes various facial movements in an effort to dispel. Sheesh…)

What is the big deal about celebrities without, makeup? It’s a repeated theme in coverage. We think it’s several factors:

1. Reporters, web-geeks, and open-source programmers love to show how clever they are. Check out the comments on Rihanna at various sites like the Destiny Forum and other sub-literate discussion boards. If you can see through everything, you can’t see anything.

2. Chance and nature. Who looks great first thing in the morning… or heading home drunk or high from a party — or, ulp, getting arrested?

Few of us. Sooner or later, some reporter or photog gets a glance at someone getting into a car, or squinting their face against the flashbulbs and — gotcha! — proves to the world that the world they pimp out for internet clicks is not what it seems.

BMFD.

3. Other women are jealous. We hate to say it, but it happens. Check out the discussion of makeup in The Last Picture Show.

Anyway, that’s our analysis. It matters, not because Megan Fox has anything to prove… but because the culture, and the aforementioned scum-bags, are exposed by their periodic forays into Makeupgate.

Ironic, that. What do some of these reporters look like, “without their makeup”? And how good do their motives look? You wanna make some posts, boys and girls? Ya, we thought so.

Megan Fox Fan Group. Makeup welcome.

Megan Fox without makeup — resources

Megan Fox at WithougMake.com

Megan Fox without makeup at ZeroMaekup.com.

Even as she prepares to dominate the summer box office, we pause to celebrate some of Rosie Huntington-Whiteley’s most compelling femdom images….

Including riding fetish, strap-on, girl beats boy, celebrity boot worship, girl whips boy, foot-slave fantasy, high heel fetish, female assassin, male doggie training, and leg and pantyhose fetish, to name just a few.

For a wider and higher-quality gallery selection, and regular updates on Rosie Huntington-Whiteley and others, visit our Femme Fatale Fetish Group at Yahoo, below.

Femme Fatale Fetish — Deadlier than the Male