Celebrity Dominatrix

Dear Ms. Blue:

We respect Entertainment Tonight, and note with satisfaction that you personally seem to be a journalist of integrity.

You seem to understand something about women, and pregnancy. You proudly took note of a recent interview on motherhood, for example, tweeting “ITS BEYONCE’S FIRST ON CAMERA INTERVIEW POST BABY.” (Your all-caps, not ours.)

But a member of your staff, Steve Jones, lied to Megan Fox to induce an interview…

asked her about pregnancy despite his promise not to…

and then essentially bragged about it in a sarcastic boast designed to raise his own profile and the show’s — regardless of its impact on your integrity and that of ET.

All this, in apparent complete indifference to the sensitivities, both personal and medical, a woman faces early in a pregnancy.

You can read our report on Jones’s callous disregard for your reputation as a journalist and woman, here.

We encourage you to demand a meaningful apology from Mr. Jones, and, even if it comes, reprimand and suspend him. Anything less creates the appearance that you approve of what he did.

If he does not issue such an apology, or refuses to abide by a suspension, you should fire him.

Other entertainment personalities will be watching to see if ET maintains standards of probity and promise-keeping. We trust they, and your viewers, will act accordingly.

Readers: click here to tweet Linda Bell Blue on firing Steve Jones — or use the tweet button here:

Tweet

Celebrity Dominatrix — we don’t lie to our sources

k, fellas, here’s the thing:

When a woman is in the early stages of pregnancy, there’s a lot to do.

First of all, there’s the very good possibility, sad but true, that an early pregnancy will end in miscarriage.

Even when it doesn’t, there are relatives and friends to inform… people whose feelings will be hurt if they aren’t told early…

So when journalist — speaking loosely now — Steve Jones asked Megan Fox about her rumored pregnancy, he crossed a line.

Fox’s publicist remonstrated, she walked out of the interview.

Pray don’t throw the first amendment at us: We didn’t say he broke the law. He just crossed a line.

“I’d like to formerly (sic) apologize to Ms. Fox for attacking her with the word baby. Thankfully, there was a publicist there to stop me,” Jones later quipped.

This apology is as insincere as it is disinformational.

Jones promised —
as a condition of the interview —
not to bring up the pregnancy rumors.

He didn’t break the law; he didn’t attack her with the word “baby.” And no one (straw man argument alert) ever said he did.

He broke his word, which was used to induce Ms. Fox to offer an exclusive interview.

Entertainment Tonight owes Fox and her husband an apology. We don’t expect it.

When it doesn’t come, though, other stars should be very reticent about dealing with the show… whether it’s with Jones or other staff there.

Click here to send Steve Jones a tweet — tell him he’s a pig.

Tweet

Megan Fox Fan Group.


Celebrity Dominatrix — we don’t lie to our sources

Taylor Momsen needs a new bootlicker….

It seems her existing press and publicity team has failed to remove numerous offending items from her heel tips…

… and failed to leave that fine sheen she desires on her leather.

Sigh… what’s a soon-to-be 19-year-old girl to do?

Well, you can probably find an ad on Craigslist to fill in for her regular slaves.

And note: There’s more stuff to worship in our sexy Taylor Momsen femdom images at the Taylor Momsen Worship Group.

Tweet

Taylor Momsen — Girlydom of the Dispoable Male



DieForHer.com — #1 Femme Fatale Fetish

“There they go again” on Megan Fox, who, according to the Maekup Nazis, is, without her kit, indistinguishable from a prune.

Take a close look. Yah, there’s some makeup and probaby photoshop enhancement.

To which, all we have to say is, “Ja und?”

For more background, check out our Megan Fox without makeup thread, here.)

Megan Fox Fan Group. Makeup welcome.


Celebrity Dominatrix — your antidote to “Makeupgate”

We’ve written before about Megan Fox’s alleged less-than-desirable appearance when appearing au natural. (Check out the Megan Fox without makeup thread, here.)

Here she is in a photo hyped online recently as “pre-boob-job.” Well, we’re taking a close look there: perky, pointy, nice. But notice also, we have a crossover pic here: Very light makeup, little or no blush, light or no eyeliner.

Result? Em… She’s gorgeous. Makeup Nazis, pop culture denizens, chattering class: get over it! So why the continuing scrutiny?

1. Some are jealous. We hate to say it, but it happens. Check out the discussion of makeup in The Last Picture Show.

2. Some like to pose. “Oooh, lookit me, I’m suggesting a famous, prominent beauty isn’t so attractive.” Please.

We say again: The pop-culture press loves Makeupgate. Ironic, that. What do some of these reporters look like, “without their makeup”?

Megan Fox Fan Group. Makeup welcome.


Celebrity Dominatrix — your antidote to “Makeupgate”